Discussion:
unfair and biased holding up of posts (censorship)
(too old to reply)
Archimedes Plutonium
2011-12-21 21:18:12 UTC
Permalink
I would like NANA to look into the fact that there are means of
holding up
the posts of others from reaching the readership newsboards. I believe
the
practice is that some goon squads of ISP attendants see posts before
they
reach the newsboards and have some means of hindering those posts
from actually arriving at the newsboard.

I think one trick is that these news-feeds attendants flag a author
and when that author "sends a post" the flagging stops or halts the
post from reaching
the newsboard in a timely manner. Some of my posts have been held up
for
hours.

I posted this and it immediately appeared in the newsgroup.

Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:07:06 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Dec 21 2011 3:07 pm
Subject: Re: Exoplanets even smaller than Earth found, some are even
burned out gas giant cores!
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Some of these planets are in the Venus size range: 76%, 87%, and 87%
respectively. One is just slightly over Earth range, 103%. Two of them
are assumed to be the burned out remnants of gas giant planets after
they were swallowed by their star during its red-giant phase.
Surprisingly, they survived their time inside the oven!
BBC News - Newly found planets are 'roasted remains'http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16279016
Yousuf Khan
Did they show rigid body rotation

Earlier, I had posted this post and it still does not appear:

Alright, yesterday surprized me significantly for I had no idea that I
would redefine what is Quantum Mechanics. The idea that charge is the
most significant feature of Quantum Mechanics and that "discreteness"
is not as important as is "charge". Before yesterday, Quantum
Mechanics was defined as the Physics of
discreteness, but now I see that "charge" itself is the fundamental
unit of Quantum Mechanics. That means that in old-physics, they
thought Maxwell theory was part of Classical Physics of Newtonian
Mechanics and not part of
Quantum Mechanics. In new-physics (physics with the arrival of the
Atom Totality of 1990), in new-physics the Maxwell theory stands at
the center of
Quantum Mechanics and that the Planck experiments of discreteness are
not the
central theme of QM but rather Maxwell Equations stand at the center
of Quantum Mechanics.

Now I know that this will have a chapter of its own in the next
edition of this book
but for now, in that I am trying to make the book flow in reading,
this will have to stand in this very long chapter of Positron Space=
gravity.

The idea that the definition of Quantum Mechanics is rightfully
inclusive of the Maxwell Equations allows me for the first time in the
history of physics to overhaul and revise all of Newtonian Mechanics,
by first revising the famous Newton formula that Force equals Mass
times Acceleration F=ma.

In New Physics, we revise that to be Force = Charge times Acceleration
and
write it as thus F=ca. We take the Faraday Law of Magnetic Induction
of
the electromagnetic current generated is proportional to the rate of
change of the magnetic field.

Now Coulomb's Law alone does not give us a force for it is static
electricity, but Faraday's Law is dynamic and gives us the force.

In Newtonian Mechanics, F=ma, we had to rely and depend on force as
outside
actions on a system, but in the revision, the force is the system
itself.

In this overall of Newtonian Mechanics, we see that Charge creates the
mass or matter that is important in F=ma. In New Physics, the Faraday
Law becomes F=ma because the mass or matter is created or is
influenced by the
force itself. In Old Physics, they made a horrible assumption of
assuming some mass and matter was influenced by a force at a distance.
In New Physics, we no longer assume "influence at a distance" but
rather we recognize Faraday's Law as a field law. In Newtonian
Mechanics of F=ma
they had a horrible notion, a false notion of a "field law" such as in
gravity that
the center of Earth pulls all the mass and matter of Earth. In
Faraday's Law as
gravity, the force is already a field and the positron space as the
center of Earth pulls all the particles of matter towards the center
of Earth.

So in Old Physics they had forces without fields. In New Physics, all
forces have their Faraday Law field. In New Physics, mass is secondary
since charge is primary and creates mass in the Faraday law, whether
it creates the electric current or creates the mass of the electrons
in that current or creates the mass of a planet like Earth as the
field of influence.

So in New Physics, this silly and stupid quest of a Higgs Mechanism
with a Higgs boson is a fantasy fairy tale quest by physicists who
cannot even see that Saturn has rigid body rotation yet has no missing
mass problems and thus
all of Old Physics needs renovation and revising. In New Physics,
mass and matter derive from Charge and not some over zealous fantasy
dreamer of a
Higgs Mechanism.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Archimedes Plutonium
2011-12-21 21:50:38 UTC
Permalink
I would like for NANA to look into this situation where a author sends
a post
that never appears yet a minute later sends another post in a
different thread
that shows up immediately on the news reader board. I believe there is
a method
of censoring where some goon-clod-squad flags an author and thus
holding up and
delaying for hours that author's post.

The two identical posts below where one appeared immediately, yet the
first post
was delayed for hours.


Received: by 10.68.190.2 with SMTP id gm2mr6054946pbc.4.1324503340671;
Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:35:40 -0800 (PST)
Path: lh20ni49282pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!
postnews.google.com!x19g2000yqf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,sci.math
Subject: Defining QM and redefining Newton's F=ma to F=ca #152 Atom
Totality
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:56:49 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 81
Message-ID:
<d72d36e9-986f-48ac-84b4-***@x19g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.147.126.82
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1324503340 27549 127.0.0.1 (21 Dec 2011
21:35:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-***@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:35:40 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-***@google.com
Injection-Info: x19g2000yqf.googlegroups.com; posting-
host=166.147.126.82; posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-
us)
AppleWebKit/530.19.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.2 Safari/
530.19,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1


Received: by 10.68.212.232 with SMTP id nn8mr6029564pbc.
1.1324502483831;
Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:21:23 -0800 (PST)
Path: lh20ni49242pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!
postnews.google.com!y18g2000yqy.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,sci.math
Subject: Defining QM and redefining Newton's F=ma to F=ca #152 Atom
Totality
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:21:23 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <21a01634-5ae3-4c46-
a22f-***@y18g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.147.126.82
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1324502483 19311 127.0.0.1 (21 Dec 2011
21:21:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-***@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:21:23 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-***@google.com
Injection-Info: y18g2000yqy.googlegroups.com; posting-
host=166.147.126.82; posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-
us)
AppleWebKit/530.19.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.2 Safari/
530.19,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1



Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Tonico
2011-12-22 00:59:59 UTC
Permalink
On Dec 21, 11:18 pm, Archimedes Plutonium
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
I would like NANA to look into the fact that there are means of
holding up
the posts of others from reaching the readership newsboards. I believe
the
practice is that some goon squads of ISP attendants see posts before
they
reach the newsboards and have some means of hindering those posts
from actually arriving at the newsboard.
I think one trick is that these news-feeds attendants flag a author
and when that author "sends a post" the flagging stops or halts the
post from reaching
the newsboard in a timely manner. Some of my posts have been held up
for
hours.
I posted this and it immediately appeared in the newsgroup.
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:07:06 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Dec 21 2011 3:07 pm
Subject: Re: Exoplanets even smaller than Earth found, some are even
burned out gas giant cores!
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Some of these planets are in the Venus size range: 76%, 87%, and 87%
respectively. One is just slightly over Earth range, 103%. Two of them
are assumed to be the burned out remnants of gas giant planets after
they were swallowed by their star during its red-giant phase.
Surprisingly, they survived their time inside the oven!
BBC News - Newly found planets are 'roasted remains'http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16279016
        Yousuf Khan
Did they show rigid body rotation
Alright, yesterday surprized me significantly for I had no idea that I
would redefine what is Quantum Mechanics.
Any forum-posted message beginning as above should be thrown away. and
the quicker the better.
Now, if you read that in a peer reviewed journal...

Loading...