NANA, please expunge this forgery post and reprimand the forger

[Archimedes Plutonium]

NANA, the below is a forgery. NANA is obligated to
police not only forgery of the FROM line but also
forgery of the signature block. Forgeries in Usenet
can occur on the From-line and signature block.

Up till now NANA has done a fine job of policing the
From-line but has been lax to derelict in policing
the signature block of forgery. When someone sees their name placed
into the signature block of another
and calls attention to NANA. Then NANA is obligated
to expunge that forgery.



------------------------------------

Oh, I think the only person who "thinks" (and I am being extremely
generous with that word) that there are any issues of forgery are AP
himself.
Given the outlandishness of his claims, I think that is what raises
the humour value.
As with all nutjobs on Usenet, only those who know they don't have a
case actually talk about it in public. Those with genuine (insert
criminal act here) concerns call a lawyer :)
--
Marc Bissonnette

And the lawyer says that I have to go through NANA to remove the
forgery. And if NANA does not remove the forgeries then the Courts will
remove Marc and NANA administrators for failing to do their job.

No such lawyer ever gave you any such advice - Period. (Either that, or
if one did, they either laughed their arse off as they cashed your
retainer cheque, or you got some "free" legal advice from a lawyer who
specializes in real estate law and has yet to log into the Internet for
the first time, much less Usenet)

That I have to document the criminal activity. Defamation is not
defamation unless it is repetitive.

Actually, defamation is defamation, period. Once or a thousand times -
There are plenty of precendents in both US and Canadian case law to show
successful libel suits for a single publication of libel.

If Marc is a worker at NANA, he is obviously unfit for the job.

A "worker" "at" a collection of newsgroups ? You quite obviously haven't
the faintest inkling of how Usenet actually works, do you ? (Don't answer
that: The answer is a blindingly obvious "No, you do not")

A signature block is meant for the signature of the author of the
text, and many posts to Usenet are missing of the name of the author of
the text. Throwing almost everything else but the *name of the author
of the text* in the signature block is a Marc nutjob.

No, actually, in Usenet, a .sig is a block of text preceded usually by
two hyphens, a blank space and a carriage return and may contain just
about anything one desires - Including quoted text by other authors. I've
seen my own words quoted in some other people's .sigs before -
Personally, I was rather tickled (shout out to Bev at BEI Design,
speaking of which... :) )

So to Marc, a most heinous post filled with false accusations, foul
language, rascist comments, threats, and posted with an anonymous FROM
line and whose signature block is this
--
"Oh, I think"
Marc Bissonnette
is totally acceptable to Marc and finds nothing wrong with it.

Frankly, it wouldn't bother me, because I obviously am not the author of
the post. Both the From: address and the NNTP posting host header would
prove this.

NANA needs to review Signature Blocks. NANA, to their credit, cleaned
up FROM lines of forgery. But now it needs to clean up signature blocks
of forgery.

News.admin.net-news.abuse.* needs to do no such thing - especially at the
beckoning from one who cannot grasp even the basics of Usenet.
--
"I am a looney crack-pot who thinks NANA.* is run by black helicoper
pilots"
-Archimedes Plutonium - Date unknown.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

[Vindicator2009]

On Mar 6, 10:22 pm, Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

The rules only apply to posts with content.  Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Archie, are you sure you're not having a kafkian dialogue with some of
your alter egos? Perhaps this is a terrible result of your new
"math"...?
Check it, son...check it.

Vindicator

Ps. Nana, I think I didn't post the above so don't erase it.

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

NANA can't expunge anything. You know that therefore you are 100%
trolling.

Forgery?. The "forgery" shows:

X-Complaints-To: ***@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843

While your header shows:

X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en)
+ AppleWebKit/125.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.9,


AGAIN AP, you know better than anyone around that complaints go to
X-Complaints-To: ***@aioe.org in that aioe.org is where the "forger"
posted from.

It can't be rulled out that you aren't using a MacOS for one and
and MOE for another.

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Also, please to never forget that the letters in my name
"Archimedes Plutonium" can be re-arranged to spell

"Mr meticulous pinhead"
"The delicious rump man"
"comp.uranus.let.him.die"
"Penis could mature him"
"Tiresome unlaid chump"

And hundreds of other delightful phrases.

[David Bernier]

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Also, please to never forget that the letters in my name
"Archimedes Plutonium" can be re-arranged to spell
"Mr meticulous pinhead"
"The delicious rump man"
"comp.uranus.let.him.die"
"Penis could mature him"
"Tiresome unlaid chump"
And hundreds of other delightful phrases.

What follows is not legal advice. I am not an attorney.

I've been thinking (for fun) on possible avenues for complaints.
Usenet is a collection of Bulletin boards. Some individuals
have administrative powers (oversight) of Usenet (a/the collectivity
of all or some of the Bulletin boards).

You could try to argue that the Bulletin Board or forum
administrators have been negligent.

Negligence, why?

(A) Copyright issues

That's a tough question. You could try to allege infringement
of copyright. Although you may post through Google Groups (GG),
you have only given GG a license, and not transferred your
copyright in your work to GG. Those who go on quoting a
substantial part of your copyrighted work (say
two pages, not counting repeats, when all is amalgamated)
*might* be going beyond fair use. They likely
have no license to redistribute your work, let alone
having part-ownership of your intellectual property.

(B) Possible defamation issues

Those who mix-up the letters of your name could be alleged to
be defaming you, although I think it's a long stretch.

Avenues for relief:

(1) Have you requested the writers to stop?

(2) Have you contacted those with administrative duties
in the Usenet service provided to the writers who
write things that bug you?

(3) If (1) and (2) don't do what you want to have done,
you could complain to those who have administrative
duties in the Collectivity of Newsgroups (aka Usenet).

(4) As a last resort, petition a court by filing papers
describing your complaint and why you thing
you are wronged in some way.

As a matter of tradition/decorum/etc., it's
considered bad form (I think) to demand that
the judge do something. The judge is the
adjudicator of disputes (the referee (sports)
but where the game is all over Earth).

Since judge ~~== ref., better not make demands.
Instead, the things you ask the judge/court
to do are formulated traditionally as

Prayer for Relief
=================

[etc.]

- request #1

- request #2

...

Respectfully submitted,

[sign].


Dave

[Fred Hall]

On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:05:06 -0500, David Bernier

Post by David Bernier
What follows is not legal advice. I am not an attorney.

Yet you go on to offer legal advice (advise) anyway

--

Archimedes Plutonium will never destroy my .sig

[David Bernier]

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:05:06 -0500, David Bernier

Post by David Bernier
What follows is not legal advice. I am not an attorney.

Yet you go on to offer legal advice (advise) anyway

You may be right that what I wrote after what you quote
constitutes advising someone in legal matters.

I also disclaimed being an attorney. I now disclaim
holding the degree of Juris Doctor.
I have no law degree of any kind.

Hopefully, I can mitigate eventual legal problems of my own that way.


David Bernier

Post by Fred Hall
--
Archimedes Plutonium will never destroy my .sig

[Fred Hall]

On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:45:54 -0500, David Bernier

Post by David Bernier

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:05:06 -0500, David Bernier

Post by David Bernier
What follows is not legal advice. I am not an attorney.

Yet you go on to offer legal advice (advise) anyway

You may be right that what I wrote after what you quote
constitutes advising someone in legal matters.
I also disclaimed being an attorney. I now disclaim
holding the degree of Juris Doctor.
I have no law degree of any kind.
Hopefully, I can mitigate eventual legal problems of my own that way.

Dude, you're in deep doo-doo now. Better hope Archie doesn't hold you
accountable for your legal advice

Post by David Bernier
David Bernier

Post by Fred Hall
--
Archimedes Plutonium will never destroy my .sig

[David Bernier]

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:45:54 -0500, David Bernier

Post by David Bernier

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:05:06 -0500, David Bernier

Post by David Bernier
What follows is not legal advice. I am not an attorney.

Yet you go on to offer legal advice (advise) anyway

You may be right that what I wrote after what you quote
constitutes advising someone in legal matters.
I also disclaimed being an attorney. I now disclaim
holding the degree of Juris Doctor.
I have no law degree of any kind.
Hopefully, I can mitigate eventual legal problems of my own that way.

Dude, you're in deep doo-doo now. Better hope Archie doesn't hold you
accountable for your legal advice

Over here, we have heard of
Can doo option
4 Archie (tinw) ...

[J. Clarke]

Post by David Bernier

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Also, please to never forget that the letters in my name
"Archimedes Plutonium" can be re-arranged to spell
"Mr meticulous pinhead"
"The delicious rump man"
"comp.uranus.let.him.die"
"Penis could mature him"
"Tiresome unlaid chump"
And hundreds of other delightful phrases.

What follows is not legal advice. I am not an attorney.
I've been thinking (for fun) on possible avenues for complaints.
Usenet is a collection of Bulletin boards. Some individuals
have administrative powers (oversight) of Usenet (a/the collectivity
of all or some of the Bulletin boards).

No, actually they don't. USENET is a distributed system with no
heirarchy of management. There is no one central server for any newsgroup.

Post by David Bernier
You could try to argue that the Bulletin Board or forum
administrators have been negligent.

Which administrators?

Post by David Bernier
Negligence, why?
(A) Copyright issues
That's a tough question. You could try to allege infringement
of copyright. Although you may post through Google Groups (GG),
you have only given GG a license, and not transferred your
copyright in your work to GG. Those who go on quoting a
substantial part of your copyrighted work (say
two pages, not counting repeats, when all is amalgamated)
*might* be going beyond fair use. They likely
have no license to redistribute your work, let alone
having part-ownership of your intellectual property.

I believe that in the context of electronic bulletin board systems that
ship sailed long ago.

Post by David Bernier
(B) Possible defamation issues
Those who mix-up the letters of your name could be alleged to
be defaming you, although I think it's a long stretch.

Under whose laws and who has standing to press charges? USENET is
international.

Post by David Bernier
(1) Have you requested the writers to stop?
(2) Have you contacted those with administrative duties
in the Usenet service provided to the writers who
write things that bug you?

Do those things violate the published TOS? Are they unlawful in the
locality in which that system is located?

Post by David Bernier
(3) If (1) and (2) don't do what you want to have done,
you could complain to those who have administrative
duties in the Collectivity of Newsgroups (aka Usenet).

Which would be who, exactly? You may as well try to petition the King
of Cats.

Post by David Bernier
(4) As a last resort, petition a court by filing papers
describing your complaint and why you thing
you are wronged in some way.

And so you make trouble for one service provider, so the guy who annoys
you finds another, this time in a jurisdiction hostile to wherever you
are located.

Post by David Bernier
As a matter of tradition/decorum/etc., it's
considered bad form (I think) to demand that
the judge do something. The judge is the
adjudicator of disputes (the referee (sports)
but where the game is all over Earth).

If you are going to go to court, hire a lawyer.

Post by David Bernier
Since judge ~~== ref., better not make demands.
Instead, the things you ask the judge/court
to do are formulated traditionally as
Prayer for Relief
=================
[etc.]
- request #1
- request #2
...
Respectfully submitted,
[sign].

As a general rule if someone annoys you, killfile him and either his
head will explode or he'll find a more entertaining target.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

David Bernier wrote:
(snipped)

Post by David Bernier
What follows is not legal advice. I am not an attorney.

It works from "precedence" of similar cases of the past. I remember
one
of Michigan, one of Canada where a person in education won on
defamation.

Many of these cases end up in England where the law is pretty strict
and serious
on defamation and Internet related.

Whether I end up hiring, or pro bono, or not at all. I am in the
documenting phase.

And also, these attackers add more fame to me. Jesus would have never
have risen as
far as he did, if they had let him alone to preach, would he? The more
commotion
my detractors stir up, the more famous I become. But I do not want to
end up on
some cross crucified. I have to steer through the hatred of my
detractors with reason
and logic. They work on hatred, I work on logic and reason. And in
time, others
will see that I did them a favor also, in making Usenet a cleaner
place where their
name is not forged into a signature block, by some bully hatemonger.
So the "right
and justice" is on my side.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
(snipped)

Post by David Bernier
What follows is not legal advice. I am not an attorney.

It works from "precedence" of similar cases of the past. I remember
one
of Michigan, one of Canada where a person in education won on
defamation.
Many of these cases end up in England where the law is pretty strict
and serious
on defamation and Internet related.
Whether I end up hiring, or pro bono, or not at all. I am in the
documenting phase.
And also, these attackers add more fame to me. Jesus would have never
have risen as
far as he did, if they had let him alone to preach, would he? The more
commotion
my detractors stir up, the more famous I become. But I do not want to
end up on
some cross crucified. I have to steer through the hatred of my
detractors with reason
and logic. They work on hatred, I work on logic and reason. And in
time, others
will see that I did them a favor also, in making Usenet a cleaner
place where their
name is not forged into a signature block, by some bully hatemonger.
So the "right
and justice" is on my side.
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Clear as mud. This guy is the real deal.

[Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.]

On Mar 6, 10:12 pm, Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
(snipped)

Post by David Bernier
What follows is not legal advice. I am not an attorney.

It works from "precedence" of similar cases of the past. I remember
one
of Michigan, one of Canada where a person in education won on
defamation.
Many of these cases end up in England where the law is pretty strict
and serious
on defamation and Internet related.
Whether I end up hiring, or pro bono, or not at all. I am in the
documenting phase.
And also, these attackers add more fame to me. Jesus would have never
have risen as
far as he did, if they had let him alone to preach, would he? The more
commotion
my detractors stir up, the more famous I become. But I do not want to
end up on
some cross crucified. I have to steer through the hatred of my
detractors with reason
and logic. They work on hatred, I work on logic and reason. And in
time, others
will see that I did them a favor also, in making Usenet a cleaner
place where their
name is not forged into a signature block, by some bully hatemonger.

Do you mean to say that Archimedes Plutonium is your REAL name?

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
So the "right
and justice" is on my side.
Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

[Chris]

"Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:72fcf71b-945e-43a1-8786-***@x1g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
.
Do you mean to say that Archimedes Plutonium is your REAL name?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Likebox/Archimedes_Plutonium

[Seth]

Post by David Bernier
What follows is not legal advice. I am not an attorney.

It shows.

Post by David Bernier
I've been thinking (for fun) on possible avenues for complaints.

Whining is by far the most popular.

Post by David Bernier
Usenet is a collection of Bulletin boards.

No, it isn't.

"USENET is not a right."
"USENET is a right, a left, a jab, and a sharp uppercut to the
jaw. The postman hits! You have new mail." --Ed Vielmetti & Chip
Salzenberg

Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea--massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it.

Post by David Bernier
Some individuals have administrative powers (oversight) of Usenet
(a/the collectivity of all or some of the Bulletin boards).

No, some individuals have administrative powers over parts of Usenet.

Post by David Bernier
You could try to argue that the Bulletin Board or forum
administrators have been negligent.

You could try. You could fail.

Post by David Bernier
Negligence, why?
(A) Copyright issues
That's a tough question. You could try to allege infringement
of copyright.

And in the US, the DMCA protects the administrators.

Post by David Bernier
(B) Possible defamation issues

In the US, the DMCA protects the administrators.

Post by David Bernier
(1) Have you requested the writers to stop?

Does whining count?

Post by David Bernier
(2) Have you contacted those with administrative duties
in the Usenet service provided to the writers who
write things that bug you?

They aren't obligated to act.

Post by David Bernier
(3) If (1) and (2) don't do what you want to have done,
you could complain to those who have administrative
duties in the Collectivity of Newsgroups (aka Usenet).

Of whom there are none, at least for that sort of duties.

Post by David Bernier
(4) As a last resort, petition a court by filing papers
describing your complaint and why you thing
you are wronged in some way.

And see how well that works. I dibs the popcorn concession.

Seth

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Also, please to never forget that the letters in my name
"Archimedes Plutonium" can be re-arranged to spell
"Mr meticulous pinhead"
"The delicious rump man"
"comp.uranus.let.him.die"
"Penis could mature him"
"Tiresome unlaid chump"
And hundreds of other delightful phrases.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Stop forgering myself!

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Also, please to never forget that the letters in my name
"Archimedes Plutonium" can be re-arranged to spell
"Mr meticulous pinhead"
"The delicious rump man"
"comp.uranus.let.him.die"
"Penis could mature him"
"Tiresome unlaid chump"
And hundreds of other delightful phrases.

Stop forgering myself! Do not be to yet again
defending myself against my own posts. We are
the arranging of ASCII characters to for lines
and pressing the 'post' button - the entire Universe
is a gigantic blog. The Edit Totality theory explains
this with Google's Internet of newsgroups.

[Fred Hall]

On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:22:54 -0800 (PST), Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

The real Archie would not have written that. You, sir, are a fraud,
and wouldn't make a pimple on the real Archimedes Plutonium's ass. The
real AP was much, much smarter

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Note to MAABOF: Sometimes you have to take the Plutonium by the horns
and hope you don't get irradiated

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:22:54 -0800 (PST), Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

The real Archie would not have written that. You, sir, are a fraud,
and wouldn't make a pimple on the real Archimedes Plutonium's ass. The
real AP was much, much smarter

20 yrs down the road may account for "smarts" loss, like hair for
instance. AP may be bald as a buzzard. I'm not convinced. Posts based
on his "whole entire Universe is just one big atom" from yesterday
to sci.math/physics point to the lad being the real deal.

IMO, you can't just jack this sh*t.

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Note to MAABOF: Sometimes you have to take the Plutonium by the horns
and hope you don't get irradiated

Since "he" won't engage our inquiries (Fred) we still speculate.
To remove all doubt entails a round trip flight to a.r.k posing questions,
ready when you are.

[Fred Hall]

On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 06:56:45 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:22:54 -0800 (PST), Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

The real Archie would not have written that. You, sir, are a fraud,
and wouldn't make a pimple on the real Archimedes Plutonium's ass. The
real AP was much, much smarter

20 yrs down the road may account for "smarts" loss, like hair for
instance. AP may be bald as a buzzard. I'm not convinced. Posts based
on his "whole entire Universe is just one big atom" from yesterday
to sci.math/physics point to the lad being the real deal.
IMO, you can't just jack this sh*t.

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Note to MAABOF: Sometimes you have to take the Plutonium by the horns
and hope you don't get irradiated

Since "he" won't engage our inquiries (Fred) we still speculate.
To remove all doubt entails a round trip flight to a.r.k posing questions,
ready when you are.

Sure. Let's do it

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Any assistance likely to be found in the memory bank of ark?
We have an upstart Archie Plutonium posting complaints
and threats to sue NANA for some forgeries<-- A feat only
a single-atom universe physicist might pull off.

Since Kibo et al know more about AP than anyone should have to,
we're doing some background checking to figure out if this "Archie"
is the real deal flake or a fake.

TIA
GSTQ

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 06:56:45 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:22:54 -0800 (PST), Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

The real Archie would not have written that. You, sir, are a fraud,
and wouldn't make a pimple on the real Archimedes Plutonium's ass. The
real AP was much, much smarter

20 yrs down the road may account for "smarts" loss, like hair for
instance. AP may be bald as a buzzard. I'm not convinced. Posts based
on his "whole entire Universe is just one big atom" from yesterday
to sci.math/physics point to the lad being the real deal.
IMO, you can't just jack this sh*t.

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Note to MAABOF: Sometimes you have to take the Plutonium by the horns
and hope you don't get irradiated

Since "he" won't engage our inquiries (Fred) we still speculate.
To remove all doubt entails a round trip flight to a.r.k posing questions,
ready when you are.

Sure. Let's do it

[Fred Hall]

On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 19:12:55 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
Any assistance likely to be found in the memory bank of ark?
We have an upstart Archie Plutonium posting complaints
and threats to sue NANA for some forgeries<-- A feat only
a single-atom universe physicist might pull off.
Since Kibo et al know more about AP than anyone should have to,
we're doing some background checking to figure out if this "Archie"
is the real deal flake or a fake.

Would Archie hang out in South Dakota?

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
TIA
GSTQ

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 06:56:45 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:22:54 -0800 (PST), Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

The real Archie would not have written that. You, sir, are a fraud,
and wouldn't make a pimple on the real Archimedes Plutonium's ass. The
real AP was much, much smarter

20 yrs down the road may account for "smarts" loss, like hair for
instance. AP may be bald as a buzzard. I'm not convinced. Posts based
on his "whole entire Universe is just one big atom" from yesterday
to sci.math/physics point to the lad being the real deal.
IMO, you can't just jack this sh*t.

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Note to MAABOF: Sometimes you have to take the Plutonium by the horns
and hope you don't get irradiated

Since "he" won't engage our inquiries (Fred) we still speculate.
To remove all doubt entails a round trip flight to a.r.k posing questions,
ready when you are.

Sure. Let's do it

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 19:12:55 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
Any assistance likely to be found in the memory bank of ark?
We have an upstart Archie Plutonium posting complaints
and threats to sue NANA for some forgeries<-- A feat only
a single-atom universe physicist might pull off.
Since Kibo et al know more about AP than anyone should have to,
we're doing some background checking to figure out if this "Archie"
is the real deal flake or a fake.

Would Archie hang out in South Dakota?

DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
TIA
GSTQ

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 06:56:45 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:22:54 -0800 (PST), Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

The real Archie would not have written that. You, sir, are a fraud,
and wouldn't make a pimple on the real Archimedes Plutonium's ass. The
real AP was much, much smarter

20 yrs down the road may account for "smarts" loss, like hair for
instance. AP may be bald as a buzzard. I'm not convinced. Posts based
on his "whole entire Universe is just one big atom" from yesterday
to sci.math/physics point to the lad being the real deal.
IMO, you can't just jack this sh*t.

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Note to MAABOF: Sometimes you have to take the Plutonium by the horns
and hope you don't get irradiated

Since "he" won't engage our inquiries (Fred) we still speculate.
To remove all doubt entails a round trip flight to a.r.k posing questions,
ready when you are.

Sure. Let's do it

--
NANA, the below is a forgery. NANA is obligated to
police not only forgery of the FROM line but also
forgery of the signature block. Forgeries in Usenet
can occur on the From-line and signature block.

[Fred Hall]

On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 19:38:41 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 19:12:55 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
Any assistance likely to be found in the memory bank of ark?
We have an upstart Archie Plutonium posting complaints
and threats to sue NANA for some forgeries<-- A feat only
a single-atom universe physicist might pull off.
Since Kibo et al know more about AP than anyone should have to,
we're doing some background checking to figure out if this "Archie"
is the real deal flake or a fake.

Would Archie hang out in South Dakota?

DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

IP shows South Dakota for the latest Archie

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
TIA
GSTQ

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 06:56:45 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:22:54 -0800 (PST), Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

The real Archie would not have written that. You, sir, are a fraud,
and wouldn't make a pimple on the real Archimedes Plutonium's ass. The
real AP was much, much smarter

20 yrs down the road may account for "smarts" loss, like hair for
instance. AP may be bald as a buzzard. I'm not convinced. Posts based
on his "whole entire Universe is just one big atom" from yesterday
to sci.math/physics point to the lad being the real deal.
IMO, you can't just jack this sh*t.

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Note to MAABOF: Sometimes you have to take the Plutonium by the horns
and hope you don't get irradiated

Since "he" won't engage our inquiries (Fred) we still speculate.
To remove all doubt entails a round trip flight to a.r.k posing questions,
ready when you are.

Sure. Let's do it

--
NANA, the below is a forgery. NANA is obligated to
police not only forgery of the FROM line but also
forgery of the signature block. Forgeries in Usenet
can occur on the From-line and signature block.

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 19:38:41 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 19:12:55 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
Any assistance likely to be found in the memory bank of ark?
We have an upstart Archie Plutonium posting complaints
and threats to sue NANA for some forgeries<-- A feat only
a single-atom universe physicist might pull off.
Since Kibo et al know more about AP than anyone should have to,
we're doing some background checking to figure out if this "Archie"
is the real deal flake or a fake.

Would Archie hang out in South Dakota?

DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

IP shows South Dakota for the latest Archie

Now it's personal. 8)

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
TIA
GSTQ

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 06:56:45 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:22:54 -0800 (PST), Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

The real Archie would not have written that. You, sir, are a fraud,
and wouldn't make a pimple on the real Archimedes Plutonium's ass. The
real AP was much, much smarter

20 yrs down the road may account for "smarts" loss, like hair for
instance. AP may be bald as a buzzard. I'm not convinced. Posts based
on his "whole entire Universe is just one big atom" from yesterday
to sci.math/physics point to the lad being the real deal.
IMO, you can't just jack this sh*t.

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Note to MAABOF: Sometimes you have to take the Plutonium by the horns
and hope you don't get irradiated

Since "he" won't engage our inquiries (Fred) we still speculate.
To remove all doubt entails a round trip flight to a.r.k posing questions,
ready when you are.

Sure. Let's do it

--
NANA, the below is a forgery. NANA is obligated to
police not only forgery of the FROM line but also
forgery of the signature block. Forgeries in Usenet
can occur on the From-line and signature block.

[Oh no it's that Idiot again!!!]

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 19:38:41 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 19:12:55 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
Any assistance likely to be found in the memory bank of ark?
We have an upstart Archie Plutonium posting complaints
and threats to sue NANA for some forgeries<-- A feat only
a single-atom universe physicist might pull off.
Since Kibo et al know more about AP than anyone should have to,
we're doing some background checking to figure out if this "Archie"
is the real deal flake or a fake.

Would Archie hang out in South Dakota?

DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

IP shows South Dakota for the latest Archie

He doesn't necessarily have to be housed in the same asylum all his life,
he might be moved around to get a different outlook!

[David DeLaney]

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
Any assistance likely to be found in the memory bank of ark?
We have an upstart Archie Plutonium posting complaints
and threats to sue NANA for some forgeries<-- A feat only
a single-atom universe physicist might pull off.
Since Kibo et al know more about AP than anyone should have to,
we're doing some background checking to figure out if this "Archie"
is the real deal flake or a fake.

Would Archie hang out in South Dakota?

DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

Note, however, that that FAQ was last updated 16 years ago now. The poster
is using the techniques and style that Archie used to, based on the
few looks I've taken...

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, I did not write the below, please expunge it also

The real Archie would not have written that. You, sir, are a fraud,
and wouldn't make a pimple on the real Archimedes Plutonium's ass. The
real AP was much, much smarter

<snrrrk> ...drattit, now I have spots on my monitor.

Dave

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
Any assistance likely to be found in the memory bank of ark?
We have an upstart Archie Plutonium posting complaints
and threats to sue NANA for some forgeries<-- A feat only
a single-atom universe physicist might pull off.
Since Kibo et al know more about AP than anyone should have to,
we're doing some background checking to figure out if this "Archie"
is the real deal flake or a fake.

Would Archie hang out in South Dakota?

DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

Note, however, that that FAQ was last updated 16 years ago now.

Good point. A lot can happen in 16 years; with my real estate "luck"
I've had to ..............move several times.

Post by David DeLaney
The poster is using the techniques and style that Archie used to,
based on the few looks I've taken...

Yea, the style and the mindy-buggling equations, that's our boy alright.

[Adam Funk]

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

Note, however, that that FAQ was last updated 16 years ago now. The poster
is using the techniques and style that Archie used to, based on the
few looks I've taken...

...the FAQ that's so I old I've seen it mentioned in a liberry book?

[David DeLaney]

Post by Adam Funk

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

Note, however, that that FAQ was last updated 16 years ago now. The poster
is using the techniques and style that Archie used to, based on the
few looks I've taken...

...the FAQ that's so I old I've seen it mentioned in a liberry book?

I an I sez yes

Dave "spam was NEW then" DeLaney

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Adam Funk

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

Note, however, that that FAQ was last updated 16 years ago now. The poster
is using the techniques and style that Archie used to, based on the
few looks I've taken...

...the FAQ that's so I old I've seen it mentioned in a liberry book?

I an I sez yes

Your dreadlocks are showing from under your tinfoil do rag Dave.

Post by David DeLaney
Dave "spam was NEW then" DeLaney

If you had the foresight to put a counter on the bugger, bets are that
the hits would generate a number too great for Archie to factor into the
New "Rockthrowers" Math. If I had enough time and pizza in the freezer
I'd set out to rastle the beast an update.

Alas..., he said after a few minutes of consideration, giving the
beast a short back and sides with today's legends might change the
whole appearance for the worsT.

$20 (same as in town)
Brylcreem®

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Adam Funk

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

Note, however, that that FAQ was last updated 16 years ago now. The poster
is using the techniques and style that Archie used to, based on the
few looks I've taken...

...the FAQ that's so I old I've seen it mentioned in a liberry book?

I an I sez yes
Dave "spam was NEW then" DeLaney

See's we are on the subject of Legends.

I am sure I'm not the only one that has many open accounts
left in memory for which there is often never any closure. To
those I always feel that brayne money is stuck in a stasis
which could otherwise be used for new customers.

One of those "accounts" carved into the FAQ is held by
Bruce Becker. Bruce is one of the Toronto Afflictive along
with Richard, Chris Lewis (Ottawa but close enough), Mercer,
Allisat, Baptista and self. Cory Doctorow, son of E.L and a
handful of others above, less distracted by funny stuff have
gone onto much success and notoriety.

I am a small player in that Sexton dragged me to their lair in
the 90s, a weekly meeting in a University of Toronto lecture room
called "Unix Unanimous". The cabal, and you bet there is, were in
generally in religious attendance.

So in the FAQ Bruce's entry touches on the legendary "bot" that
newgrouped *every* single rmgroup ever sent to control for a decade.
No newsgroups could be dropped/vapored/removed from news as a result.
News admins went riot globally generating enough heat to melt the poles.
To the day Bruce, denies any part in spite of the "bot" being resident
and fed sirloin at _his_ infamous gts.org. There is no question Becker
had the skills to set such a demon[sic] loose on news, but his persistent
hold on his position adds to the legend. What ensued as a result is
chronicled here.

Knights of the TorFreeNet
http://tinyurl.com/yaqpdea

Best to assign the role of the "taunter" to Becker for perfect
understanding.

His reign as High Muckymuck, albeit short-lived, at the TorFreeNet
was fun to say the least. The servers and bandwidth were donated by
UUnet "bigs" to bring the masses up to a philanthropic speed.
With 10s of thousands of the cracked-or-otherwise users under Bruce's
rule, he did a damn fine job of playing Braveheart for years. It is
rumored that the gts demon was a Frankenstein monster created out of a
bitter dispute over "Hello Kitty", which was Becker's online nym,
guarded with his lethal Unix armaments.

Currently on Facebook, not a day goes by without Bruce making a posting
a lament to "Top News" Facebook-style like this.

'Bruce Becker regrets the loss of his "Hello Kittyhawk" name
because of a picky Facebook pinhead. Also, fk "the cloud"'

What the rest of us as onlookers are wondering is how long it will be
before the "picky Facebook pinhead" goes digitally missing.

[Fred Hall]

On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 21:33:25 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Adam Funk

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

Note, however, that that FAQ was last updated 16 years ago now. The poster
is using the techniques and style that Archie used to, based on the
few looks I've taken...

...the FAQ that's so I old I've seen it mentioned in a liberry book?

I an I sez yes
Dave "spam was NEW then" DeLaney

See's we are on the subject of Legends.
I am sure I'm not the only one that has many open accounts
left in memory for which there is often never any closure. To
those I always feel that brayne money is stuck in a stasis
which could otherwise be used for new customers.
One of those "accounts" carved into the FAQ is held by
Bruce Becker. Bruce is one of the Toronto Afflictive along
with Richard, Chris Lewis (Ottawa but close enough), Mercer,
Allisat, Baptista and self. Cory Doctorow, son of E.L and a
handful of others above, less distracted by funny stuff have
gone onto much success and notoriety.
I am a small player in that Sexton dragged me to their lair in
the 90s, a weekly meeting in a University of Toronto lecture room
called "Unix Unanimous". The cabal, and you bet there is, were in
generally in religious attendance.
So in the FAQ Bruce's entry touches on the legendary "bot" that
newgrouped *every* single rmgroup ever sent to control for a decade.
No newsgroups could be dropped/vapored/removed from news as a result.
News admins went riot globally generating enough heat to melt the poles.
To the day Bruce, denies any part in spite of the "bot" being resident
and fed sirloin at _his_ infamous gts.org. There is no question Becker
had the skills to set such a demon[sic] loose on news, but his persistent
hold on his position adds to the legend. What ensued as a result is
chronicled here.
Knights of the TorFreeNet
http://tinyurl.com/yaqpdea
Best to assign the role of the "taunter" to Becker for perfect
understanding.
His reign as High Muckymuck, albeit short-lived, at the TorFreeNet
was fun to say the least. The servers and bandwidth were donated by
UUnet "bigs" to bring the masses up to a philanthropic speed.
With 10s of thousands of the cracked-or-otherwise users under Bruce's
rule, he did a damn fine job of playing Braveheart for years. It is
rumored that the gts demon was a Frankenstein monster created out of a
bitter dispute over "Hello Kitty", which was Becker's online nym,
guarded with his lethal Unix armaments.
Currently on Facebook, not a day goes by without Bruce making a posting
a lament to "Top News" Facebook-style like this.
'Bruce Becker regrets the loss of his "Hello Kittyhawk" name
because of a picky Facebook pinhead. Also, fk "the cloud"'
What the rest of us as onlookers are wondering is how long it will be
before the "picky Facebook pinhead" goes digitally missing.

"It's a new dawn, people!" -- Grace Slick at Woodsock (yes, I can
spell, you daft, can...oh, nevermind)

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Fred Hall
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 21:33:25 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Adam Funk

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

Note, however, that that FAQ was last updated 16 years ago now. The poster
is using the techniques and style that Archie used to, based on the
few looks I've taken...

...the FAQ that's so I old I've seen it mentioned in a liberry book?

I an I sez yes
Dave "spam was NEW then" DeLaney

See's we are on the subject of Legends.
I am sure I'm not the only one that has many open accounts
left in memory for which there is often never any closure. To
those I always feel that brayne money is stuck in a stasis
which could otherwise be used for new customers.
One of those "accounts" carved into the FAQ is held by
Bruce Becker. Bruce is one of the Toronto Afflictive along
with Richard, Chris Lewis (Ottawa but close enough), Mercer,
Allisat, Baptista and self. Cory Doctorow, son of E.L and a
handful of others above, less distracted by funny stuff have
gone onto much success and notoriety.
I am a small player in that Sexton dragged me to their lair in
the 90s, a weekly meeting in a University of Toronto lecture room
called "Unix Unanimous". The cabal, and you bet there is, were in
generally in religious attendance.
So in the FAQ Bruce's entry touches on the legendary "bot" that
newgrouped *every* single rmgroup ever sent to control for a decade.
No newsgroups could be dropped/vapored/removed from news as a result.
News admins went riot globally generating enough heat to melt the poles.
To the day Bruce, denies any part in spite of the "bot" being resident
and fed sirloin at _his_ infamous gts.org. There is no question Becker
had the skills to set such a demon[sic] loose on news, but his persistent
hold on his position adds to the legend. What ensued as a result is
chronicled here.
Knights of the TorFreeNet
http://tinyurl.com/yaqpdea
Best to assign the role of the "taunter" to Becker for perfect
understanding.
His reign as High Muckymuck, albeit short-lived, at the TorFreeNet
was fun to say the least. The servers and bandwidth were donated by
UUnet "bigs" to bring the masses up to a philanthropic speed.
With 10s of thousands of the cracked-or-otherwise users under Bruce's
rule, he did a damn fine job of playing Braveheart for years. It is
rumored that the gts demon was a Frankenstein monster created out of a
bitter dispute over "Hello Kitty", which was Becker's online nym,
guarded with his lethal Unix armaments.
Currently on Facebook, not a day goes by without Bruce making a posting
a lament to "Top News" Facebook-style like this.
'Bruce Becker regrets the loss of his "Hello Kittyhawk" name
because of a picky Facebook pinhead. Also, fk "the cloud"'
What the rest of us as onlookers are wondering is how long it will be
before the "picky Facebook pinhead" goes digitally missing.

"It's a new dawn, people!" -- Grace Slick at Woodsock (yes, I can
spell, you daft, can...oh, nevermind)

I know only too painfully Fred. But now that my chances at entry into
endless boinking with nubiles and smoke-filled boozecans are nil with
my wrinkled skin and grey hair, I'll have to be content with sticking to
the good ol' days like the stain on Lewinsky's dress.

[Fred Hall]

On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:05:53 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 21:33:25 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Adam Funk

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

Note, however, that that FAQ was last updated 16 years ago now. The poster
is using the techniques and style that Archie used to, based on the
few looks I've taken...

...the FAQ that's so I old I've seen it mentioned in a liberry book?

I an I sez yes
Dave "spam was NEW then" DeLaney

See's we are on the subject of Legends.
I am sure I'm not the only one that has many open accounts
left in memory for which there is often never any closure. To
those I always feel that brayne money is stuck in a stasis
which could otherwise be used for new customers.
One of those "accounts" carved into the FAQ is held by
Bruce Becker. Bruce is one of the Toronto Afflictive along
with Richard, Chris Lewis (Ottawa but close enough), Mercer,
Allisat, Baptista and self. Cory Doctorow, son of E.L and a
handful of others above, less distracted by funny stuff have
gone onto much success and notoriety.
I am a small player in that Sexton dragged me to their lair in
the 90s, a weekly meeting in a University of Toronto lecture room
called "Unix Unanimous". The cabal, and you bet there is, were in
generally in religious attendance.
So in the FAQ Bruce's entry touches on the legendary "bot" that
newgrouped *every* single rmgroup ever sent to control for a decade.
No newsgroups could be dropped/vapored/removed from news as a result.
News admins went riot globally generating enough heat to melt the poles.
To the day Bruce, denies any part in spite of the "bot" being resident
and fed sirloin at _his_ infamous gts.org. There is no question Becker
had the skills to set such a demon[sic] loose on news, but his persistent
hold on his position adds to the legend. What ensued as a result is
chronicled here.
Knights of the TorFreeNet
http://tinyurl.com/yaqpdea
Best to assign the role of the "taunter" to Becker for perfect
understanding.
His reign as High Muckymuck, albeit short-lived, at the TorFreeNet
was fun to say the least. The servers and bandwidth were donated by
UUnet "bigs" to bring the masses up to a philanthropic speed.
With 10s of thousands of the cracked-or-otherwise users under Bruce's
rule, he did a damn fine job of playing Braveheart for years. It is
rumored that the gts demon was a Frankenstein monster created out of a
bitter dispute over "Hello Kitty", which was Becker's online nym,
guarded with his lethal Unix armaments.
Currently on Facebook, not a day goes by without Bruce making a posting
a lament to "Top News" Facebook-style like this.
'Bruce Becker regrets the loss of his "Hello Kittyhawk" name
because of a picky Facebook pinhead. Also, fk "the cloud"'
What the rest of us as onlookers are wondering is how long it will be
before the "picky Facebook pinhead" goes digitally missing.

"It's a new dawn, people!" -- Grace Slick at Woodsock (yes, I can
spell, you daft, can...oh, nevermind)

I know only too painfully Fred. But now that my chances at entry into
endless boinking with nubiles and smoke-filled boozecans are nil with
my wrinkled skin and grey hair, I'll have to be content with sticking to
the good ol' days like the stain on Lewinsky's dress.

Yes, we must make hay whilst the sun shines

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Fred Hall
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:05:53 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
"It's a new dawn, people!" -- Grace Slick at Woodsock (yes, I can
... you daft, can...oh, nevermind)

I'll have to be content with sticking to
the good ol' days like the stain on Lewinsky's dress.

Yes, we must make hay whilst the sun shines

I'm not much lookin forward to sundown eh?

Yer pretty smart tho, you one of them inernet gooroo er sumpthin?

[Fred Hall]

On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:45:19 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:05:53 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
"It's a new dawn, people!" -- Grace Slick at Woodsock (yes, I can
... you daft, can...oh, nevermind)

I'll have to be content with sticking to
the good ol' days like the stain on Lewinsky's dress.

Yes, we must make hay whilst the sun shines

I'm not much lookin forward to sundown eh?
Yer pretty smart tho, you one of them inernet gooroo er sumpthin?

I read it in one of Viv Eshwar's posts.

Found this for you:

"Plutonium lost his job at Dartmouth about August of 1999. After
making what he termed "science odyssey tours" of the United States and
Europe, Plutonium then moved to rural Meckling, South Dakota, where he
resumed his Usenet posting, saying he now lives on a "homestead"
apparently consisting of a house, two Airstream trailers, and a grove
of various sorts of trees."

http://www.indopedia.org/Archimedes_Plutonium.html

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Fred Hall
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:45:19 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:05:53 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
"It's a new dawn, people!" -- Grace Slick at Woodsock (yes, I can
... you daft, can...oh, nevermind)

I'll have to be content with sticking to
the good ol' days like the stain on Lewinsky's dress.

Yes, we must make hay whilst the sun shines

I'm not much lookin forward to sundown eh?
Yer pretty smart tho, you one of them inernet gooroo er sumpthin?

I read it in one of Viv Eshwar's posts.

Fred Hall, Usenet's reassuring old inspirational have-an-eye.

Post by Fred Hall
"Plutonium lost his job at Dartmouth about August of 1999. After
making what he termed "science odyssey tours" of the United States and
Europe, Plutonium then moved to rural Meckling, South Dakota, where he
resumed his Usenet posting, saying he now lives on a "homestead"
apparently consisting of a house, two Airstream trailers, and a grove
of various sorts of trees."
http://www.indopedia.org/Archimedes_Plutonium.html

Damn, sounds spiffo - he must be doing something right.


/rofl "science odyssey tours"

[Doctroid]

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
Any assistance likely to be found in the memory bank of ark?
We have an upstart Archie Plutonium posting complaints
and threats to sue NANA for some forgeries<-- A feat only
a single-atom universe physicist might pull off.
Since Kibo et al know more about AP than anyone should have to,
we're doing some background checking to figure out if this "Archie"
is the real deal flake or a fake.

Would Archie hang out in South Dakota?

DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

Note, however, that that FAQ was last updated 16 years ago now.

http://www.whitepages.com/search/FindPerson?firstname_begins_with=1&first
name=archimedes&name=plutonium&where=

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by David DeLaney

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
Any assistance likely to be found in the memory bank of ark?
We have an upstart Archie Plutonium posting complaints
and threats to sue NANA for some forgeries<-- A feat only
a single-atom universe physicist might pull off.
Since Kibo et al know more about AP than anyone should have to,
we're doing some background checking to figure out if this "Archie"
is the real deal flake or a fake.

Would Archie hang out in South Dakota?

DeLaney has him down for White River Junction, Vt. in the FAQ.

Note, however, that that FAQ was last updated 16 years ago now.

http://www.white <damn, spilled Whiteout® again>

As intersting a find as it is, I don't subscribe to outing old Archie
on this one. We need him here unfettered from crank callers for another
decade of edumuckational wizardry.

I've done the math, and knowing some of us here are 60 or worse, a decade
more would be spiffo.

[Doctroid]

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
As intersting a find as it is, I don't subscribe to outing old Archie
on this one. We need him here unfettered from crank callers for another
decade of edumuckational wizardry.
I've done the math, and knowing some of us here are 60 or worse, a decade
more would be spiffo.

Old news, I read it here long before I reposted it; 'sides, any crank
with any basic stalkerating skills can find it in seconds.

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Doctroid

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
As intersting a find as it is, I don't subscribe to outing old Archie
on this one. We need him here unfettered from crank callers for another
decade of edumuckational wizardry.
I've done the math, and knowing some of us here are 60 or worse, a decade
more would be spiffo.

Old news, I read it here long before I reposted it; 'sides, any crank
with any basic stalkerating skills can find it in seconds.

What's important here is how did Archie manage to stay off my radar for
the last two handfulls of years, then re-appear from the void like a
remake of "The Day the Earth Stood Still"?

[Fred Hall]

On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:18:57 -0800, "Archimedes Plutonium"

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The rules only apply to posts with content. Because of our long
history of content-free posts, the rules do not apply to us.

Fraud. The real Archie left Usenet long ago.

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, the below is a forgery. NANA is obligated to
police not only forgery of the FROM line but also
forgery of the signature block. Forgeries in Usenet
can occur on the From-line and signature block.
Up till now NANA has done a fine job of policing the
From-line but has been lax to derelict in policing
the signature block of forgery. When someone sees their name placed
into the signature block of another
and calls attention to NANA. Then NANA is obligated
to expunge that forgery.

AP does one have to reply to your "Reply to:" field in order to get a
ruling on this, er, and yourself? What credentials would you be willing
to offer up to remove any rumors you're not the original Archimedes
Plutonium?

How could you ask a newsgroup, with no physical location, board of
directors, aministrator, owner or even a real life name to be "oblicated
to police" anything whatsoever? Is this just a troll because you're
currently bored with the current spate of sci guys that present you with
so little muscle fibre compared to the past?

If you're pressed for time, throw us a bone on this quick question.

What do you think of James Parry?

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
------------------------------------

Oh, I think the only person who "thinks" (and I am being extremely
generous with that word) that there are any issues of forgery are AP
himself.
Given the outlandishness of his claims, I think that is what raises
the humour value.
As with all nutjobs on Usenet, only those who know they don't have a
case actually talk about it in public. Those with genuine (insert
criminal act here) concerns call a lawyer :)
--
Marc Bissonnette

And the lawyer says that I have to go through NANA to remove the
forgery. And if NANA does not remove the forgeries then the Courts will
remove Marc and NANA administrators for failing to do their job.

No such lawyer ever gave you any such advice - Period. (Either that, or
if one did, they either laughed their arse off as they cashed your
retainer cheque, or you got some "free" legal advice from a lawyer who
specializes in real estate law and has yet to log into the Internet for
the first time, much less Usenet)

That I have to document the criminal activity. Defamation is not
defamation unless it is repetitive.

Actually, defamation is defamation, period. Once or a thousand times -
There are plenty of precendents in both US and Canadian case law to show
successful libel suits for a single publication of libel.

If Marc is a worker at NANA, he is obviously unfit for the job.

A "worker" "at" a collection of newsgroups ? You quite obviously haven't
the faintest inkling of how Usenet actually works, do you ? (Don't answer
that: The answer is a blindingly obvious "No, you do not")

A signature block is meant for the signature of the author of the
text, and many posts to Usenet are missing of the name of the author of
the text. Throwing almost everything else but the *name of the author
of the text* in the signature block is a Marc nutjob.

No, actually, in Usenet, a .sig is a block of text preceded usually by
two hyphens, a blank space and a carriage return and may contain just
about anything one desires - Including quoted text by other authors. I've
seen my own words quoted in some other people's .sigs before -
Personally, I was rather tickled (shout out to Bev at BEI Design,
speaking of which... :) )

So to Marc, a most heinous post filled with false accusations, foul
language, rascist comments, threats, and posted with an anonymous FROM
line and whose signature block is this
--
"Oh, I think"
Marc Bissonnette
is totally acceptable to Marc and finds nothing wrong with it.

Frankly, it wouldn't bother me, because I obviously am not the author of
the post. Both the From: address and the NNTP posting host header would
prove this.

NANA needs to review Signature Blocks. NANA, to their credit, cleaned
up FROM lines of forgery. But now it needs to clean up signature blocks
of forgery.

News.admin.net-news.abuse.* needs to do no such thing - especially at the
beckoning from one who cannot grasp even the basics of Usenet.
--
"I am a looney crack-pot who thinks NANA.* is run by black helicoper
pilots"
-Archimedes Plutonium - Date unknown.

[Fred Hall]

On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:27:24 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
What do you think of James Parry?

He was pretty good as a goalie until he suffered that injury to his
Achilles tendon

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:27:24 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
What do you think of James Parry?

He was pretty good as a goalie until he suffered that injury to his
Achilles tendon

Kibo played hockey?

[Fred Hall]

On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 06:58:28 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:27:24 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
What do you think of James Parry?

He was pretty good as a goalie until he suffered that injury to his
Achilles tendon

Kibo played hockey?

Often

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 06:58:28 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:27:24 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
What do you think of James Parry?

He was pretty good as a goalie until he suffered that injury to his
Achilles tendon

Kibo played hockey?

Often

Damn.

[Fred Hall]

On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:41:17 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 06:58:28 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:27:24 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
What do you think of James Parry?

He was pretty good as a goalie until he suffered that injury to his
Achilles tendon

Kibo played hockey?

Often

Damn.

YHBT

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Fred Hall
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:41:17 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 06:58:28 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:27:24 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
What do you think of James Parry?

He was pretty good as a goalie until he suffered that injury to his
Achilles tendon

Kibo played hockey?

Often

Damn.

YHBT

Oh I was on many occasions, missed the hockey though.
I best resub and see if any of the old boys
that kicked my ass good are still among the troops.

Andrew Bostick where are you?

[Marc Bissonnette]

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, the below is a forgery. NANA is obligated to
police not only forgery of the FROM line but also
forgery of the signature block. Forgeries in Usenet
can occur on the From-line and signature block.
Up till now NANA has done a fine job of policing the
From-line but has been lax to derelict in policing
the signature block of forgery. When someone sees their name placed
into the signature block of another
and calls attention to NANA. Then NANA is obligated
to expunge that forgery.
------------------------------------

Oh, I think the only person who "thinks" (and I am being extremely
generous with that word) that there are any issues of forgery are
AP himself.
Given the outlandishness of his claims, I think that is what
raises the humour value.
As with all nutjobs on Usenet, only those who know they don't have
a case actually talk about it in public. Those with genuine
(insert criminal act here) concerns call a lawyer :)
--
Marc Bissonnette

And the lawyer says that I have to go through NANA to remove the
forgery. And if NANA does not remove the forgeries then the Courts
will remove Marc and NANA administrators for failing to do their
job.

No such lawyer ever gave you any such advice - Period. (Either that,
or if one did, they either laughed their arse off as they cashed your
retainer cheque, or you got some "free" legal advice from a lawyer
who specializes in real estate law and has yet to log into the
Internet for the first time, much less Usenet)

That I have to document the criminal activity. Defamation is not
defamation unless it is repetitive.

Actually, defamation is defamation, period. Once or a thousand times
- There are plenty of precendents in both US and Canadian case law to
show successful libel suits for a single publication of libel.

If Marc is a worker at NANA, he is obviously unfit for the job.

A "worker" "at" a collection of newsgroups ? You quite obviously
haven't the faintest inkling of how Usenet actually works, do you ?
(Don't answer that: The answer is a blindingly obvious "No, you do
not")

A signature block is meant for the signature of the author of the
text, and many posts to Usenet are missing of the name of the
author of the text. Throwing almost everything else but the *name
of the author of the text* in the signature block is a Marc nutjob.

No, actually, in Usenet, a .sig is a block of text preceded usually
by two hyphens, a blank space and a carriage return and may contain
just about anything one desires - Including quoted text by other
authors. I've seen my own words quoted in some other people's .sigs
before - Personally, I was rather tickled (shout out to Bev at BEI
Design, speaking of which... :) )

So to Marc, a most heinous post filled with false accusations, foul
language, rascist comments, threats, and posted with an anonymous
FROM line and whose signature block is this
--
"Oh, I think"
Marc Bissonnette
is totally acceptable to Marc and finds nothing wrong with it.

Frankly, it wouldn't bother me, because I obviously am not the author
of the post. Both the From: address and the NNTP posting host header
would prove this.

NANA needs to review Signature Blocks. NANA, to their credit,
cleaned up FROM lines of forgery. But now it needs to clean up
signature blocks of forgery.

News.admin.net-news.abuse.* needs to do no such thing - especially at
the beckoning from one who cannot grasp even the basics of Usenet.
--
"I am a looney crack-pot who thinks NANA.* is run by black helicoper
pilots"
-Archimedes Plutonium - Date unknown.

My very own NANA removal request! Am I an official employee, now, NANA
boss ? (tinb) Can I have a corner office ? Better yet, can I work in the
penthouse suite so I can see the black helicopters leaving the helipad
each day ?

If I am not mistaken, I should report for work at NANA headquarters at
2430 E Street, Washington, D.C., right ?
<some of you will get a kick out of that };-)> >

[Fred Hall]

On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:04:17 -0600, Marc Bissonnette

Post by Marc Bissonnette
If I am not mistaken, I should report for work at NANA headquarters at
2430 E Street, Washington, D.C., right ?
<some of you will get a kick out of that };-)> >

I'm unemployed. Could you find a position for me?

[Marc Bissonnette]

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:04:17 -0600, Marc Bissonnette

Post by Marc Bissonnette
If I am not mistaken, I should report for work at NANA headquarters at
2430 E Street, Washington, D.C., right ?
<some of you will get a kick out of that };-)> >

I'm unemployed. Could you find a position for me?

Oh, gee, I dunno - As a new employee of NANA.*, I don't want to appear too
presumtuous with my new employers. Tell ya what, though: I'll put in a good
word for you and perhaps you can come work for the entity (tine) known as
NANA - Howsabout that ?

I think, though, it is a prerequisite to first have a forgery removal
request by AP - That is how I received my employment offer.

[Fred Hall]

On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:15:05 -0600, Marc Bissonnette

Post by Marc Bissonnette

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:04:17 -0600, Marc Bissonnette

Post by Marc Bissonnette
If I am not mistaken, I should report for work at NANA headquarters at
2430 E Street, Washington, D.C., right ?
<some of you will get a kick out of that };-)> >

I'm unemployed. Could you find a position for me?

Oh, gee, I dunno - As a new employee of NANA.*, I don't want to appear too
presumtuous with my new employers. Tell ya what, though: I'll put in a good
word for you and perhaps you can come work for the entity (tine) known as
NANA - Howsabout that ?

Wow! Super!

Post by Marc Bissonnette
I think, though, it is a prerequisite to first have a forgery removal
request by AP - That is how I received my employment offer.

Hmmmm.....

<dusts off decade(s) old HipCrime NewsAgent>

Hey, I know, I'll cancel those offending posts for Archie!

I really need a job. I'm desperate...

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:15:05 -0600, Marc Bissonnette

Post by Marc Bissonnette

Post by Fred Hall
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:04:17 -0600, Marc Bissonnette

Post by Marc Bissonnette
If I am not mistaken, I should report for work at NANA headquarters at
2430 E Street, Washington, D.C., right ?
<some of you will get a kick out of that };-)> >

I'm unemployed. Could you find a position for me?

Oh, gee, I dunno - As a new employee of NANA.*, I don't want to appear too
presumtuous with my new employers. Tell ya what, though: I'll put in a good
word for you and perhaps you can come work for the entity (tine) known as
NANA - Howsabout that ?

Wow! Super!

Post by Marc Bissonnette
I think, though, it is a prerequisite to first have a forgery removal
request by AP - That is how I received my employment offer.

Hmmmm.....
<dusts off decade(s) old HipCrime NewsAgent>
Hey, I know, I'll cancel those offending posts for Archie!
I really need a job. I'm desperate...

Not so fast....

/Punches in number for Dave the Resurrector (ret.)

<***@ekufob.edu>

[Richard Scoville]

Stop forging yourself!

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Marc Bissonnette

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, the below is a forgery. NANA is obligated to
police not only forgery of the FROM line but also
forgery of the signature block. Forgeries in Usenet
can occur on the From-line and signature block.

Big snip

Post by Marc Bissonnette

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

--
"I am a looney crack-pot who thinks NANA.* is run by black helicoper
pilots"
-Archimedes Plutonium - Date unknown.

My very own NANA removal request! Am I an official employee, now, NANA
boss ? (tinb) Can I have a corner office ? Better yet, can I work in the
penthouse suite so I can see the black helicopters leaving the helipad
each day ?

Save your breath. AP isn't taking calls. Rumor has it AP posts
but doesn't read news w/o his name in a header or sig.


/turns to sci.* for any sort of reality on this.


What's the general rule in sci.* for getting AP's attention lads?
Or is that an oxymoron?

[Chris]

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Marc Bissonnette

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, the below is a forgery. NANA is obligated to
police not only forgery of the FROM line but also
forgery of the signature block. Forgeries in Usenet
can occur on the From-line and signature block.

Big snip

Post by Marc Bissonnette

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

--
"I am a looney crack-pot who thinks NANA.* is run by black helicoper
pilots"
-Archimedes Plutonium - Date unknown.

My very own NANA removal request! Am I an official employee, now, NANA
boss ? (tinb) Can I have a corner office ? Better yet, can I work in the
penthouse suite so I can see the black helicopters leaving the helipad
each day ?

Save your breath. AP isn't taking calls. Rumor has it AP posts
but doesn't read news w/o his name in a header or sig.
/turns to sci.* for any sort of reality on this.
What's the general rule in sci.* for getting AP's attention lads?
Or is that an oxymoron?

Doh! The clue is in his first post of this thread.
Quote him in your sig.

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Chris

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Marc Bissonnette

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, the below is a forgery. NANA is obligated to
police not only forgery of the FROM line but also
forgery of the signature block. Forgeries in Usenet
can occur on the From-line and signature block.

Big snip

Post by Marc Bissonnette

Post by Archimedes Plutonium

--
"I am a looney crack-pot who thinks NANA.* is run by black helicoper
pilots"
-Archimedes Plutonium - Date unknown.

My very own NANA removal request! Am I an official employee, now, NANA
boss ? (tinb) Can I have a corner office ? Better yet, can I work in the
penthouse suite so I can see the black helicopters leaving the helipad
each day ?

Save your breath. AP isn't taking calls. Rumor has it AP posts
but doesn't read news w/o his name in a header or sig.
/turns to sci.* for any sort of reality on this.
What's the general rule in sci.* for getting AP's attention lads?
Or is that an oxymoron?

Doh! The clue is in his first post of this thread.
Quote him in your sig.

Yea I saw that, are you a sci.* guy though? Those lads know better than
we lads here in the 9th circle of Hell. Does AP actually have conversation
and how long ago was it he started posting again?

Call us fans of the original's shenanigans.

[Chris]

<Snippy>

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Chris

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
/turns to sci.* for any sort of reality on this.
What's the general rule in sci.* for getting AP's attention lads?
Or is that an oxymoron?

Doh! The clue is in his first post of this thread.
Quote him in your sig.

Yea I saw that, are you a sci.* guy though? Those lads know better than
we lads here in the 9th circle of Hell. Does AP actually have conversation
and how long ago was it he started posting again?

No, I'm not in the sci* heirachy.
While we all have a touch of insanity in us, my madness has not yet reached
that stage.

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
Call us fans of the original's shenanigans.

I'm not a fan (yet), but I'm warming to him.

In some ways, I feel very sorry for his ilk. It's almost as if society has
failed them.
Trouble is, there is such a fine line between what the majority would call
normality and genius. That line cannot be drawn accurately because we are
all different.
At least the internet/usenet gives these people an outlet, otherwise they
would be standing on top of a building shooting people to get their theories
publicised.

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Chris
<Snippy>

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Chris

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
/turns to sci.* for any sort of reality on this.
What's the general rule in sci.* for getting AP's attention lads?
Or is that an oxymoron?

Doh! The clue is in his first post of this thread.
Quote him in your sig.

Yea I saw that, are you a sci.* guy though? Those lads know better than
we lads here in the 9th circle of Hell. Does AP actually have conversation
and how long ago was it he started posting again?

No, I'm not in the sci* heirachy.
While we all have a touch of insanity in us, my madness has not yet reached
that stage.

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs
Call us fans of the original's shenanigans.

I'm not a fan (yet), but I'm warming to him.

kOoks, like obeying traffic signs and falling from ladders, can teach us a
lot about life.

Post by Chris
In some ways, I feel very sorry for his ilk. It's almost as if society has
failed them.
Trouble is, there is such a fine line between what the majority would call
normality and genius. That line cannot be drawn accurately because we are
all different.
At least the internet/usenet gives these people an outlet, otherwise they
would be standing on top of a building shooting people to get their theories
publicised.

In their vision the old Usenet architects saved thousands from a similar
fate.

Post by Chris
Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov became so depressed after his prophesy about the
world ending in May 2008, that he tried to commit suicide by hitting himself
on the head with a log.

Beautiful.

[Chris]

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Chris
Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov became so depressed after his prophesy about the
world ending in May 2008, that he tried to commit suicide by hitting himself
on the head with a log.

Beautiful.

The Lumber Cartel thank you.
All the better for being true.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3677129.ece

Chris

[Androcles]

Post by Chris

Post by Mad as a Box of Frogs

Post by Chris
Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov became so depressed after his prophesy about the
world ending in May 2008, that he tried to commit suicide by hitting himself
on the head with a log.

Beautiful.

The Lumber Cartel thank you.
All the better for being true.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3677129.ece
Chris
--
There may be many flowers in a man's life, but there is but one rose.
But in a woman's life, but there is but only one prick.

But how many but times do you but want to say "but" in your but sentence,
prick?

[Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.]

On Mar 6, 12:02 pm, Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, the below is a forgery. NANA is obligated to
police not only forgery

You have too much faith in your British grandmother's omnipotence,
mate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandparent

In Britain, New England[3] and Australia Nan, Nana, Nanna, Nanny and
other variations are often used for grandmother in both writing and
speech.

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
of the FROM line but also
forgery of the signature block. Forgeries in Usenet
can occur on the From-line and signature block.
Up till now NANA has done a fine job of policing the
From-line but has been lax to derelict in policing
the signature block of forgery. When someone sees their name placed
into the signature block of another
and calls attention to NANA. Then NANA is obligated
to expunge that forgery.
------------------------------------

Oh, I think the only person who "thinks" (and I am being extremely
generous with that word) that there are any issues of forgery are AP
himself.
Given the outlandishness of his claims, I think that is what raises
the humour value.
As with all nutjobs on Usenet, only those who know they don't have a
case actually talk about it in public. Those with genuine (insert
criminal act here) concerns call a lawyer :)
--
Marc Bissonnette

And the lawyer says that I have to go through NANA to remove the
forgery. And if NANA does not remove the forgeries then the Courts will
remove Marc and NANA administrators for failing to do their job.

No such lawyer ever gave you any such advice - Period. (Either that, or
if one did, they either laughed their arse off as they cashed your
retainer cheque, or you got some "free" legal advice from a lawyer who
specializes in real estate law and has yet to log into the Internet for
the first time, much less Usenet)

That I have to document the criminal activity. Defamation is not
defamation unless it is repetitive.

Actually, defamation is defamation, period. Once or a thousand times -
There are plenty of precendents in both US and Canadian case law to show
successful libel suits for a single publication of libel.

If Marc is a worker at NANA, he is obviously unfit for the job.

A "worker" "at" a collection of newsgroups ? You quite obviously haven't
the faintest inkling of how Usenet actually works, do you ? (Don't answer
that: The answer is a blindingly obvious "No, you do not")

A signature block is meant for the signature of the author of the
text, and many posts to Usenet are missing of the name of the author of
the text. Throwing almost everything else but the *name of the author
of the text* in the signature block is a Marc nutjob.

No, actually, in Usenet, a .sig is a block of text preceded usually by
two hyphens, a blank space and a carriage return and may contain just
about anything one desires - Including quoted text by other authors. I've
seen my own words quoted in some other people's .sigs before -
Personally, I was rather tickled (shout out to Bev at BEI Design,
speaking of which... :) )

So to Marc, a most heinous post filled with false accusations, foul
language, rascist comments, threats, and posted with an anonymous FROM
line and whose signature block is this
--
"Oh, I think"
Marc Bissonnette
is totally acceptable to Marc and finds nothing wrong with it.

Frankly, it wouldn't bother me, because I obviously am not the author of
the post. Both the From: address and the NNTP posting host header would
prove this.

NANA needs to review Signature Blocks. NANA, to their credit, cleaned
up FROM lines of forgery. But now it needs to clean up signature blocks
of forgery.

News.admin.net-news.abuse.* needs to do no such thing - especially at the
beckoning from one who cannot grasp even the basics of Usenet.
--
"I am a looney crack-pot who thinks NANA.* is run by black helicoper
pilots"
-Archimedes Plutonium - Date unknown.

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

Post by Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.
On Mar 6, 12:02 pm, Archimedes Plutonium

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, the below is a forgery. NANA is obligated to
police not only forgery

You have too much faith in your British grandmother's omnipotence,
mate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandparent
In Britain, New England[3] and Australia Nan, Nana, Nanna, Nanny and
other variations are often used for grandmother in both writing and
speech.

Yea somebody needs to buy Ostap a scotch and heavy water for this one.

[Seth]

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, the below is a forgery.

You mean Marc didn't really write it? Prove it.

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA is obligated to

absolutely nothing.

Seth

[J. Clarke]

Post by Seth

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA, the below is a forgery.

You mean Marc didn't really write it? Prove it.

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
NANA is obligated to

absolutely nothing.

He seems to think that a newsgroup is some kind of legal entity.